Gwen Stefani’s rep claims Gwen is not pregnant

Several weeks ago, WENN put up a series of photos of Gwen Stefani and added the news that she was expecting her third child. I was surprised, just because before that moment, I wasn’t aware that she had announced anything. Well, she didn’t. WENN just got the report from random sources, then put up the info like it was breaking news. Since then, most photo agencies have been on minor bump-watch, and over the weekend there were even new photos of Gwen looking bumpy. Now her rep tells E! that she’s NOT expecting:

The latest photo of Gwen Stefani cradling her midsection means nothing!

Trying to put an end to the ongoing round of bump watch, a rep for the pop queen tells E! News exclusively that Stefani is not pregnant, have no doubt about it.

👉 For more insights, check out this resource.

Over the past week, paparazzi took notice of the singer’s baggier-than-usual clothing and tendency to carry a big bag over her belly. Which, if you look closely, probably isn’t any rounder than usual.

Stefani is already mommy to two sons, Kingston, who will be 4 this weekend, and 21-month-old Zuma, with hubby Gavin Rossdale.

👉 Discover more in this in-depth guide.

[From E! News]

It’s really none of my business, and if she was pregnant, I just would have wished her well and gone along with my day. But I do find it strange that for weeks her reps were all “no comment” and now all of a sudden they’re denying it. So… she’s not pregnant. She’s just been posing for candid photos in really baggy clothes and pronounced “bump” for weeks. Did Gwen want some attention or something? Or is it our fault for raising the bump-watch flag every time a girl eats a burrito? Honestly, I’m not blaming myself. I kept seeing photos of her where she looked pregnant, and seemed to style herself as if she was carrying a bump. I didn’t run the other story until WENN “confirmed” it, so whatever. I mean, who wears these outfits in late May (in California!) when they’re NOT pregnant?